I would prefer to see us acknowledge openly that today we, who are judges rather than members of Congress, are imposing on a half-century-old statute a meaning of “sex discrimination” that the Congress that enacted it would not have accepted. This is something courts do fairly frequently to avoid statutory obsolescence and concomitantly to avoid placing the entire burden of updating old statutes on the legislative branch. We should not leave the impression that we are merely the obedient servants of the 88th Congress (1963– 1965), carrying out their wishes. We are not. We are taking advantage of what the last half century has taught.
Friday, April 7, 2017
Judge Posner defends supremacy
Here is how Judge Richard Posner rationalizes judicial supremacy, where he imposes his views on everyone:
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment